1) What was the biggest surprise for you in the reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different from your expectations?
The biggest surprise for me found in thew reading was the plethora of ways one can fund their business. Traditional methods like banking are always open, yet, I was intrigued to learn about Venture capitalists and more about those crowdfunding sites.
2) Identify at least one part of the reading that was confusing to you.
One part of the reading that was confusing to me was the idea of risk with all the different sort of situations surrounding a company and how much is needed to invest in the various aspects of each company's developmental stages.
3) If you were able to ask two questions to the author, what would you ask? Why?
If I were able to ask the author two questions they would be, if all options are closed to one should they think of self-founding their company?
Reason: If you believe in something and yet, no one is willing to invest in it does that mean that it is so revolutionary that no one understands it or that it is a failure.
Are venture capitalists only used in the late stages of a company's development?
Reason: In the big idea contest, there was a case where students that had no prototype managed to get $177,000.00 investment by a venture capitalist after the competition.
4) Was there anything you think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
I think the author was wrong about banks shying away from loans at the moment as that is their primary method of making money. Banks make very little money holding money for people and just service as lenders in their primary function. Thus, a bank without lending capability or willingness is not a very good bank.